Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Baldwin Park
This post compares Oakley, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $357,500 |
| White | 61% | 34% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 18% |
| With Kids | 45% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 24% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Baldwin Park?
A: Oakley has a smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 39950 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z