Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Bakersfield
This post compares Oakley, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Oakley (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,950 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $58,451 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $228,400 |
White | 61% | 68% |
Black | 8% | 7% |
Asian | 7% | 7% |
With Kids | 45% | 45% |
Age (median) | 34 | 30 |
Rentals | 24% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Bakersfield?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 39950 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z