Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakland to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Oakland, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakland (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 417,442 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $52,981 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $564,500 | $322,800 |
| White | 36% | 36% |
| Black | 24% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 10% |
| With Kids | 28% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 32 |
| Rentals | 60% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Oakland has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 417442 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakland or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oakland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Oakland versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakland may include: Richmond, Vallejo, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z