Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakland to Selma
This post compares Oakland, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakland (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 417,442 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $52,981 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $564,500 | $171,200 |
| White | 36% | 78% |
| Black | 24% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 28% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 30 |
| Rentals | 60% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakland or Selma?
A: Oakland has a much larger population count than Selma: 417442 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakland or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakland or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Oakland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Oakland versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakland may include: Richmond, Vallejo, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z