Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakland to San Fernando
This post compares Oakland, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakland (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 417,442 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $52,981 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $564,500 | $370,300 |
| White | 36% | 57% |
| Black | 24% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 1% |
| With Kids | 28% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 33 |
| Rentals | 60% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakland or San Fernando?
A: Oakland has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 417442 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakland or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakland or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oakland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Oakland versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakland may include: Richmond, Vallejo, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z