Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakland to San Bruno
This post compares Oakland, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakland (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 417,442 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $52,981 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $564,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 36% | 49% |
| Black | 24% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 28% |
| With Kids | 28% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 39 |
| Rentals | 60% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakland or San Bruno?
A: Oakland has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 417442 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakland or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Oakland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakland or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Oakland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Oakland versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakland may include: Richmond, Vallejo, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z