Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakland to Beverly Hills
This post compares Oakland, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakland (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 417,442 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $52,981 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $564,500 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 36% | 82% |
| Black | 24% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 9% |
| With Kids | 28% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 43 |
| Rentals | 60% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakland or Beverly Hills?
A: Oakland has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 417442 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakland or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oakland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakland or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Oakland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 60% for Oakland versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakland may include: Richmond, Vallejo, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z