Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakdale to Pasadena
This post compares Oakdale, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakdale (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,256 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $46,834 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $263,800 | $689,700 |
| White | 87% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 10% |
| Asian | 1% | 16% |
| With Kids | 41% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 41% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakdale or Pasadena?
A: Oakdale has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 22256 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakdale or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Oakdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakdale or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Oakdale versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakdale may include: Turlock, Santa-Paula, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z