Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakdale to Foster City
This post compares Oakdale, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakdale (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,256 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $46,834 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $263,800 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 87% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 47% |
| With Kids | 41% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 41% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakdale or Foster City?
A: Oakdale has a smaller population count than Foster City: 22256 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakdale or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oakdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakdale or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Oakdale versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakdale may include: Turlock, Santa-Paula, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z