Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakdale to Beverly Hills
This post compares Oakdale, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakdale (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,256 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $46,834 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $263,800 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 87% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 9% |
| With Kids | 41% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakdale or Beverly Hills?
A: Oakdale has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 22256 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakdale or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oakdale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakdale or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Oakdale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Oakdale versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakdale may include: Turlock, Santa-Paula, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z