Compare-Cities.com
Compare Norwalk to South San Francisco
This post compares Norwalk, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Norwalk (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 106,404 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $38,524 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $375,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 48% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 37% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Norwalk or South San Francisco?
A: Norwalk has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 106404 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Norwalk or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Norwalk.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Norwalk or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Norwalk.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 37% for Norwalk versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Norwalk may include: Chino, Montclair, and Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z