Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to Union City
This post compares North Highlands, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $620,200 |
| White | 65% | 21% |
| Black | 13% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 53% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 57% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or Union City?
A: North Highlands has a smaller population count than Union City: 47357 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for North Highlands versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z