Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to South San Jose Hills
This post compares North Highlands, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 65% | 36% |
| Black | 13% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 10% |
| With Kids | 41% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 57% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or South San Jose Hills?
A: North Highlands has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 47357 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for North Highlands versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z