Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares North Highlands, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $374,600 |
| White | 65% | 81% |
| Black | 13% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 3% |
| With Kids | 41% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 57% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or South Lake Tahoe?
A: North Highlands has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 47357 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average lower in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for North Highlands versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z