Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to Pico Rivera
This post compares North Highlands, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $380,200 |
| White | 65% | 55% |
| Black | 13% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 3% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 36 |
| Rentals | 57% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or Pico Rivera?
A: North Highlands has a smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 47357 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average similar in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for North Highlands versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z