Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to Eureka
This post compares North Highlands, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $249,300 |
| White | 65% | 75% |
| Black | 13% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 41% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 37 |
| Rentals | 57% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or Eureka?
A: North Highlands has a larger population count than Eureka: 47357 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average similar in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for North Highlands versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z