Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Highlands to Beverly Hills
This post compares North Highlands, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Highlands (CDP) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,357 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $35,489 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $168,300 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 65% | 82% |
| Black | 13% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 9% |
| With Kids | 41% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 43 |
| Rentals | 57% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Highlands or Beverly Hills?
A: North Highlands has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 47357 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Highlands or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in North Highlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Highlands or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in North Highlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for North Highlands versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Highlands may include: Barstow, Foothill-Farms, and San-Pablo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z