Compare-Cities.com
Compare Norco to South San Francisco
This post compares Norco, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Norco (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,711 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $58,426 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 76% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 18% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Norco or South San Francisco?
A: Norco has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 26711 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Norco or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Norco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Norco or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Norco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 18% for Norco versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Norco may include: Windsor, Moorpark, and Santee.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z