Compare-Cities.com
Compare Norco to South Pasadena
This post compares Norco, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Norco (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,711 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $58,426 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 76% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 18% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Norco or South Pasadena?
A: Norco has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 26711 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Norco or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Norco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Norco or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Norco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 18% for Norco versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Norco may include: Windsor, Moorpark, and Santee.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z