Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to South San Francisco
This post compares Newark, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 33% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 30% | 39% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or South San Francisco?
A: Newark has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 45554 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z