Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to South Pasadena
This post compares Newark, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 33% | 54% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 30% | 29% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or South Pasadena?
A: Newark has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 45554 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z