Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Selma
This post compares Newark, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $171,200 |
| White | 33% | 78% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 30% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
| Rentals | 30% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Selma?
A: Newark has a larger population count than Selma: 45554 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z