Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to San Francisco
This post compares Newark, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Newark (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,554 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $55,190 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $927,400 |
White | 33% | 47% |
Black | 5% | 5% |
Asian | 30% | 34% |
With Kids | 39% | 18% |
Age (median) | 37 | 38 |
Rentals | 30% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or San Francisco?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 45554 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z