Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Riverside
This post compares Newark, California to Riverside, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Riverside (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 321,570 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $41,576 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $319,200 |
| White | 33% | 61% |
| Black | 5% | 6% |
| Asian | 30% | 7% |
| With Kids | 39% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 31 |
| Rentals | 30% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Riverside?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Riverside: 45554 compared with 321570 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Riverside?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Riverside?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 45% for Riverside.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z