Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Riverbank
This post compares Newark, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $247,200 |
| White | 33% | 79% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 30% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Riverbank?
A: Newark has a larger population count than Riverbank: 45554 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Newark versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z