Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Richmond
This post compares Newark, California to Richmond, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Richmond (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 108,853 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $42,533 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $371,900 |
| White | 33% | 39% |
| Black | 5% | 20% |
| Asian | 30% | 14% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 30% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Richmond?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Richmond: 45554 compared with 108853 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Richmond?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Richmond?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 49% for Richmond.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z