Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Newark, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 30% | 13% |
| With Kids | 39% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 45554 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z