Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Pittsburg
This post compares Newark, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $324,500 |
| White | 33% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 16% |
| Asian | 30% | 17% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 30% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Pittsburg?
A: Newark has a smaller population count than Pittsburg: 45554 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z