Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Pasadena
This post compares Newark, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $689,700 |
| White | 33% | 53% |
| Black | 5% | 10% |
| Asian | 30% | 16% |
| With Kids | 39% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 37 |
| Rentals | 30% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Pasadena?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 45554 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z