Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Lancaster
This post compares Newark, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $213,100 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 21% |
| Asian | 30% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Lancaster?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 45554 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z