Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Foster City
This post compares Newark, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 33% | 43% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 30% | 47% |
| With Kids | 39% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Foster City?
A: Newark has a larger population count than Foster City: 45554 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z