Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Foothill Farms
This post compares Newark, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 33% | 67% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 30% | 5% |
| With Kids | 39% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 30% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Foothill Farms?
A: Newark has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 45554 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z