Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Fontana
This post compares Newark, California to Fontana, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Fontana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 207,086 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $40,918 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $323,300 |
| White | 33% | 43% |
| Black | 5% | 8% |
| Asian | 30% | 6% |
| With Kids | 39% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
| Rentals | 30% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Fontana?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Fontana: 45554 compared with 207086 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Fontana?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Fontana?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Newark versus 35% for Fontana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z