Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Folsom
This post compares Newark, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Folsom (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 75,897 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $84,884 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $456,600 |
| White | 33% | 69% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 30% | 16% |
| With Kids | 39% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Folsom?
A: Newark has a smaller population count than Folsom: 45554 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Newark does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Newark versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z