Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Beverly Hills
This post compares Newark, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 33% | 82% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 30% | 9% |
| With Kids | 39% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 43 |
| Rentals | 30% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Beverly Hills?
A: Newark has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 45554 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z