Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Baldwin Park
This post compares Newark, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Newark (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,554 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $55,190 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $357,500 |
| White | 33% | 34% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 30% | 18% |
| With Kids | 39% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 30% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Baldwin Park?
A: Newark has a smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 45554 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z