Compare-Cities.com
Compare Newark to Bakersfield
This post compares Newark, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Newark (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,554 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $55,190 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $607,200 | $228,400 |
White | 33% | 68% |
Black | 5% | 7% |
Asian | 30% | 7% |
With Kids | 39% | 45% |
Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
Rentals | 30% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Newark or Bakersfield?
A: Newark has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 45554 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Newark or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Newark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Newark or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Newark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Newark versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Newark may include: West-Covina, Chino-Hills, and South-San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z