Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to South San Francisco
This post compares National City, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | National City (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,715 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $30,943 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 61% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 19% | 39% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 67% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or South San Francisco?
A: National City has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 60715 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z