Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to San Bruno
This post compares National City, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | National City (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,715 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $30,943 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 61% | 49% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 19% | 28% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 67% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or San Bruno?
A: National City has a larger population count than San Bruno: 60715 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z