Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to Riverbank
This post compares National City, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | National City (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,715 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $30,943 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $247,200 |
| White | 61% | 79% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 19% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 67% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or Riverbank?
A: National City has a larger population count than Riverbank: 60715 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z