Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to Foothill Farms
This post compares National City, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | National City (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 60,715 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $30,943 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $201,200 |
White | 61% | 67% |
Black | 5% | 9% |
Asian | 19% | 5% |
With Kids | 42% | 38% |
Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
Rentals | 67% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or Foothill Farms?
A: National City has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 60715 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z