Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to Chino Hills
This post compares National City, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | National City (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,715 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $30,943 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $567,200 |
| White | 61% | 46% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 19% | 33% |
| With Kids | 42% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 67% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or Chino Hills?
A: National City has a similar population count than Chino Hills: 60715 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z