Compare-Cities.com
Compare National City to Beverly Hills
This post compares National City, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | National City (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,715 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $30,943 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $345,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 61% | 82% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 19% | 9% |
| With Kids | 42% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 43 |
| Rentals | 67% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, National City or Beverly Hills?
A: National City has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 60715 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in National City or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in National City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in National City or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in National City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for National City versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to National City may include: Seaside, Merced, and Imperial-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z