Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Visalia
This post compares Napa, California to Visalia, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Visalia (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 130,047 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $44,703 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $207,400 |
| White | 76% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 5% |
| With Kids | 34% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 43% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Visalia?
A: Napa has a smaller population count than Visalia: 79722 compared with 130047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Visalia?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Visalia?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 40% for Visalia.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z