Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Union City
This post compares Napa, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $620,200 |
| White | 76% | 21% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 3% | 53% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 43% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Union City?
A: Napa has a similar population count than Union City: 79722 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z