Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Napa, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $322,800 |
| White | 76% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 10% |
| With Kids | 34% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or South San Jose Hills?
A: Napa has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 79722 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z