Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to South San Francisco
This post compares Napa, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 76% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or South San Francisco?
A: Napa has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 79722 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z