Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to South Pasadena
This post compares Napa, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 76% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or South Pasadena?
A: Napa has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 79722 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z