Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Simi Valley
This post compares Napa, California to Simi Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Simi Valley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 126,546 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $61,651 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $508,600 |
| White | 76% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 9% |
| With Kids | 34% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Simi Valley?
A: Napa has a smaller population count than Simi Valley: 79722 compared with 126546 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Simi Valley?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Simi Valley?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 28% for Simi Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z