Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to San Fernando
This post compares Napa, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $370,300 |
| White | 76% | 57% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 1% |
| With Kids | 34% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or San Fernando?
A: Napa has a larger population count than San Fernando: 79722 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z